Wednesday, April 27, 2011

Part 4 - Individual Learning IV

I believe that in most ways, the needs of Canadian citizens would be benefitted most by the governmental style of a Proportional Representation Democracy. Still being a Democracy, like Canada’s current Parliamentary Government, the voices of the citizens will be included in determining the needs of the overall country. However, the major change in which I would expect a benefit would be the way that representatives are distributed. Currently in Canada, the amount of seats held by the Conservative party incorrectly represents how many votes they have received in recent elections. If Canada were to provide their seats to the parties based on their percentage of votes, then smaller parties would be given more of a fighting chance to allow their ideals to be heard alongside the older, more experienced parties. With this, the potential for coalitions and mixed ideals would become more likely, and it would be more reasonable to expect the parties to at least try and work together to try and reach greater benefit for Canadian citizens.

Plus, then maybe they’d get along and spend less money on attack ads and more on getting things done.

… Nah.

Part 4 - Individual Learning III

Type of  Democratic Government
Princples of Liberalism Rejected
Principles of Liberalism Accepted
Who has the majority of the power?
Extent of the power that can be used?
Current Examples of Government
Direct
None
Individual Rights & Freedoms, Self-Interest, Rule of Law, Suffrage (if voting takes place), Human Rights
The people (everybody has the same amount of say and control).
The people can use as much or as little as they choose, but essentially their power is limitless.
None
Parliamentary
None
Individual Rights & Freedoms, Self-Interest (to an extent), Suffrage, Rule of Law, Competition, Human Rights, Labour Protection & Unions, Welfare Capitalism, Economic Freedom, Private Property
The Executive Branch in cooperation with the Legislative Branch.
Power is shared evenly between the branches that are voted in.
United Kingdom, Canada
Republian
None
Rule of Law, Self-Interest, Competition, Individual Rights & Freedoms, Economic Freedom, Private Property, Welfare Capitalism, Human Rights, Labour Protection & Unions, Suffrage
The President & the rest of the Executive Branch
The President has control unless 2/3 of the majority votes against him.
United States, France
Proportional Representation
Self-Interest (some portions of the concept)
Individual Rights & Freedoms, Self-Interest (to an extent), Suffrage, Welfare Capitalism, Human Protection & Unions
The Government, provided that they have majority rule, as granted by the people.
Depends on if the government is a minority or majority. Majority gives total power, minority limits.
Venezuela, South Africa, Israel


Democracy is waves in a pond – with one person’s voice making waves, the ripple slowly and gently spreads. With even more people, strong waves are formed, establishing a movement.


Type of Authoritarian Government
Princples of Liberalism Rejected
Principles of Liberalism Accepted
Who has the majority of the power?
Extent of the power that can be used?
Current Examples of Government
Monarchy
Self-Interest, Individual Rights & Freedoms, Human Protection & Unions, Suffrage
Rule of Law, Human Rights (to an extent) Competition, Economic Freedom (sometimes), Competition
The Monarch (king/queen/tsar, etc.)
Complete and total power.
Saudi Arabia
Oligarchy
Self-Interest, Rule of Law, Individual Rights & Freedoms, Human Rights, Human Protection & Unions
All, depending on what the Authoritarian Government has to offer.
The minority of ‘elites’ (normally self-appointed) who have control of the country.
Complete and total power.
Russian Federation
One-Party State
Self-Interest, Rule of Law, Individual Rights & Freedoms, Human Rights, Human Protection & Unions
Suffrage (They have the RIGHT to vote for whoever … From the one party.), Others depend on what the government offers.
The leader of the single party.
Complete and total power.
Cuba, North Korea
Military Dictatorship
Self-Interest, Rule of Law, Individual Rights & Freedoms, Human Rights, Human Protection & Unions
All, depending on what the Dictatorship is trying to provide for the citizens and the country overall.
The leader of the military.
Complete and total power.
Myanmar, Egypt


Authoritarianism is staring into the dark – you think you know what’s directly ahead of you, so you blindly move forward … Until you run face-first into the brick wall that the seemingly-cooperative Government has placed in your way.

Wednesday, April 20, 2011

Part 4 - Individual Learning II

I believe that there is some form of an obligation and responsibility that Canada must uphold in regards to Afghanistan's newly embraced democratic system. Though the Afghan people were the ones to take initiative and agree to the change to democracy, they would have never even considered taking initiative to change their systematic lifestyle if it were not for Canada's consistent ushering.

However, for the assistance in upholding the new democratic views that may be needed in the future, I do believe Canada should more or less supervise from behind the scenes for the time being. If Canada continues to guide Afghanistan and tell them exactly what they should be doing, exactly how and when they should be doing it, they won't be able to try and find some form of balance that will be comfortable for their country and their people, they will simply be following in our precise footsteps. Considering the disputes that Aboriginals have had with their cultural restrictions in Canada in the past, such as the established Residential Schools, the attempt to try and forcefully convert one group of people to blend in with another is something that is both disrespectful and bound to lead to severe repercussions.

If the time comes where political unrest and violence begins to unfold in the country of Afghanistan, then yes, I believe we should be stepping in to try and help prevent injury and casualties. Although, so long as the Afghan people are trying to build a foundation for themselves that will result in a more prosperous future for all of their citizens, then we really don't have the right to try and change things to be more like us.

Tuesday, April 5, 2011

Individual Resistance 5 (Brandon & Nick)

                Regarding the rejection of Liberalism, the establishment of a Totalitarian regime is not completely necessary, but history has proven that it is the course of action that most, if not all countries and human beings have chosen to take. Considering Germany’s rejection of Liberalism in the time of Adolf Hitler, Germany became more inclined to change to a form of Fascism, which included a totalitarian leader. In Russia’s time of reform to react against the Czarist system and uncontrolled free-market economy, the Bolsheviks (communist group) and their leader, Vladimir Lenin, wanted to destroy the current system and replace it with one containing more totalitarian control.
                In a more contemporary example, even more theocratic nations such as Iran have ignored the system of Liberalism for one more focused on religious motive. Rather than including traits of Liberalism, Iran has continued to rely on their Supreme Leader, currently Ali Khamenei. With the title of ‘Supreme Leader’, Khamenei has established totalitarian traits by having more power than even the President of Iran, which is used for things such as appointing people of high positions in the military, government, and judicial court.
Throughout history, when citizens have been deprived of their basic primitive materials to support life, they have looked for someone who would be able to guide them to a more beneficial way of life. With a Totalitarian leader such as Hitler, Lenin or Supreme Leader Khamenei, the people naturally respond with hope and promise.

Monday, March 21, 2011

Digital Portfolio - Part 1: ELA

I believe that Humanities 30 has been more of a personal battle than anything else when it comes to criteria of assignments and the actual final products that I brought forth. This year, more than any other, has tested me to show more confidence and resolve in the material I discuss, as well as the beliefs and opinions I have obtained regarding certain materials and situations. Through being able to support my own thoughts, I believe my voice in my writing has become even stronger than it was before. As in the Expository Writing assignment "Part 3 - Critical Response", I believe my narrative voice seems much more firm than it ever was before.

Throughout English, I have always had difficulties branching my thoughts to offer a voice in a unique perspective, such as in the Creative Response "Individual Challenge1". Though, despite venturing out of my comfort zone to write something of that variety, I also count it as one of my biggest successes in Humanities. That assignment tested me to think from a more abstract viewpoint, and I really enjoyed taking on the challenge of something new. After re-reading the final project, I now feel more willing to try unique styles of assignments, when such an opportunity arrives.

After Grade 12, I plan to attend the University of Alberta for a Bachelor of Arts degree in Psychology. With this, I am not sure where exactly it will take me, but I want to be able to place myself in a career where I feel I can try and make a difference in the thinking of individuals for the better, to try and help shed more insight on pressing matters that envelop our world. I feel that the personal growth in my own beliefs and my own thoughts has contributed to making me feel ready to handle what may be thrown my way in the upcoming years of University, in both an educaitonal and social/personal aspect.


Expository Writing:

Hamlet's Delay
Part 3 - Critical Response

Personal Response:

On the Rainy River -- Personal Response
Personal Response to Texts -- Regaining Honour and Certainty


Creative Response:

Response to "The Swimmer's Moment"
Individual Challenge 1 -- "Let's Be Honest... (Horatio's Thoughts on Current Events)"

Independent Reading:

Fahrenheit 451

Part 3: Critical Response

From Ignorance to Greatness
Brandon Langrock

                Throughout the Lord of the Rings trilogy, and especially in the third film, The Return of the King, director Peter Jackson strives to portray and develop the idea that people, though they understandable have hesitation towards taking the right back and accepting responsibility for themselves or others, they still manage to come to terms with the situation that confronts them, and act accordingly. Though many characters in the saga display some form of personal conflict looming inside of them, a few characters shine the brightest when their homeland needs them the most. Aragorn, a strong, yet rugged member of the fellowship, shows impulsive and heroic action whenever he is needed, though the responsibilities that derive from his lineage are a heavier burden to bear for him. Sam, however, is a simple hobbit from the Shire, and originally doesn’t show any form of heroism, until the time came when obstacles brought out the inner strength that he had. With these two characters, Peter Jackson shows that individuals are capable of feeling pressures from the responsibilities and expectations that loom around them, but he also shows that those same individuals have the strength to take action, and that they have the ability to handle anything that is thrown their way.

I see in your eyes the same fear that would take the heart of me. A day may come when the courage of men fails, when we forsake our friends and break all bonds of fellowship, but it is not this day.
-          Aragorn, Lord of the Rings: Return of the King

                Aragorn, initially relying on the alias labeling him ‘Strider’, hid his true identity from the people around him, and in doing so, kept his noble lineage concealed to avoid the truth. Though he never doubted his destiny as one of the leaders of the war against Sauron and to become the future king, he was still extremely vulnerable to his own conscience. Through this self-doubt, Aragorn was consumed with fear regarding his ability to overcome the evil of the Ring, and the possibility that he would end up meeting the same fate as his ancestor before him. While leading the fellowship, Aragorn continued to doubt his actions and the wisdom that he brought forth after he lost Gandalf in the mines of Moria, as well as during the following misfortunes that came forth afterwards. However, upon witnessing the overwhelming destruction that was going to engulf the entire world, Aragorn realized that he had to come to terms with his inner turmoil.  The path that had been laid out for him could no longer be avoided, and even though there was no guarantee he would be able to handle the challenges ahead, Aragorn knew that taking no action at all would simply result in the annihilation of all Middle Earth. Director Peter Jackson used Aragorn to relate to the everyday individual in numerous ways, especially in the sense of acknowledging personal struggle. Despite the negative consequences that may come forth as a result of taking action, such as failure, there is no victory that comes from simply doing nothing at all. In the end of the trilogy, the Lord of the Rings director shows Aragorn, the newborn king, in a radiant glow, symbolizing the prosperity and good fortune that has come forth from Aragorn taking responsibility for himself. Aragorn no longer shows doubt or despair, but only comfort and optimism for the future ahead.

“I don’t think there will be a return journey, Mr. Frodo.”
-          Samwise Gamgee, Lord of the Rings: Return of the King

                Samwise Gamgee, otherwise known simply as Sam, had no direct obligation to the fellowship, as well as no personal connection to the Ring itself. Literally, the only reason he was in the fellowship was because he was caught eavesdropping on Gandalf, which resulted in Gandalf forcing him on the whirlwind adventure. Throughout the journey, Sam even shows hesitation to show his own heroic traits, and his own heroism doesn’t begin to come forth until The Return of the King. There, though, Sam begins to realize the gravity of his promise to Gandalf to protect Frodo throughout their journey, and he also draws focus from the loyalty and respect he has for Frodo as well. Unlike more natural heroes, Sam originally performs heroic actions more consciously, rather than in such an impulsive and fluent manner as more comfortable heroes such as Aragorn do. Although, in Return of the King, Sam finds himself impulsively charging into battle to save Frodo from She-lob, a massive and ferocious spider with the direct intent to kill and devour. Even with not being labeled one of the staple heroes of the Lord of the Rings saga, Sam was still willing to sacrifice his own chance for future and take responsibility for Frodo’s predicament. Despite all of the negative connotations and stereotypes about hobbits that were brought forth by the humans, Sam brings forth more of a heroic and determined nature than many of the humans in Middle Earth, despite both parties being aware and potentially discouraged by the likely demise that loomed ahead. With this, Sam portrays obvious traits of someone who was able to come to terms with the tasks at hand and follow through on necessary action. With Sam, Peter Jackson constantly emphasizes that even an everyday individual has the ability to do great things. Being a hobbit, Sam already is given a natural disadvantage in Middle Earth, and his original traits boast no positive advantage to make their journey any easier. However, he still manages to remain strong and true to himself, despite the relentless struggles that he and his comrades face. The everyday individual has the exact same potential, in the sense that we, too, can take responsibility for our own situations, or the situations of the ones around us, to take charge with the intent of creating a better tomorrow.
                Whether it is through Aragorn, a natural born leader with the hesitant, yet never-ending willpower to combat anything that is thrown his way, or even through Sam, a more common and unlikely hero, director Peter Jackson relays to the viewing audience that the traits and the background of an individual isn’t of great importance when it comes to fulfilling obligations. The fact of the matter is that any individual can do incredible things, as long as they are willing to acknowledge the responsibilities that surround them and take hold of the actions that must be done to see those responsibilities accounted for. Those who choose not to fulfill their own expectations, however, end up having their world fall to pieces around them. Whether an individual chooses to leap in and be decisive, or simply run away from all of their problems, however, is a choice that he or she has to make alone, and the consequences or rewards will be ahead on their paths throughout life accordingly.

Friday, March 4, 2011

Poetry to Film Comparison






I am using this image to relate to the poem “The Swimmer’s Moment”. In this picture, the individual is blissfully ignoring the fact that he is about to be consumed, literally.

“By their refusal they are saved
From the black pit, and also from contesting
The deadly rapids, and emerging in
The mysterious, and more ample, further waters.
And so their bland-blank faces turn and turn
Pale and forever on the rim of suction
They will not recognize.”
-          The Swimmer’s Moment by Margaret Avison, Lines 5-11

 In a symbolic view, the dragon can resemble a form of ignorance to those in the poem who choose not to combat the “deadly rapids” that are brought forth in their lives. By doing so, however, those individuals face a life of isolation, void of true enlightenment regarding the situations surrounding them. Alongside said ignorance, they find themselves longing for something more; without having taken the chance to immerse in the concept of knowing, the end result is a life spent questioning where a different decision could have led.
The very same concept can be related to Aragorn in The Lord of the Rings: Return of the King. From having ignored his lineage and responsibilities for the first two movies of the trilogy, the true king of Gondor finally began to acknowledge the expectations that had been laid out for him and his royal bloodline. Obviously, the power of the Ring and the concern over becoming corrupted like his ancestor is something to be worried over, but Aragorn eventually realized that the line had to be drawn. No longer did he have the opportunity to let “whirlpools” pass him by. Comparing his situation to the image, the dragon can also be used in a literal sense in resembling the enemy forces of Mordor, alongside the symbolic meaning. If Aragorn chose to neglect his obligations for much longer, the entire Middle Earth would have been engulfed and destroyed by the armies of Mordor. Instead, however, Aragorn decided to find his “whirlpool”, and so he dove right in, bracing himself for the “mysterious, and more ample, further waters” ahead.